ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF DECARBONIZATION: INTERNALIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AND IDENTIFICATION OF COLLABORATIVE DECARBONIZATION HUBS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/3083-7782-2026-6-21

Keywords:

decarbonization, environmental externalities, sustainable finance, clustering, machine learning, climate governance

Abstract

Introduction. This study considers concept of developing a hybrid economic–machine learning framework to analyze decarbonization as a multidimensional structural trans-formation process integrating environmental externalities, macro-financial dynamics, geopolitical risks and cross-country heterogeneity. The proposed approach is grounded in environmental economics theory extending it through da-ta-driven clustering techniques to identify structurally similar decarbonization pathways and collaborative transition hubs to internalize environmental externalities.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to consider the integration of green economy relevant theoretical and methodological directions into a single conceptual model for the analysis of decarbonization. Therefore, the author proposes to combine the theory of environmental externalities, principles of macroeconomic efficiency, concepts of sustainable financing and ESG investing, analysis of geopolitical and climate risks, modern methods and mechanisms of clustering and machine learning for common management of decarbonization as the basis of the proposed concept of the approach.

Materials and methods. The methodological framework consists of proposed four interconnected analytical steps. Firstly, the study establishes an economic foundation based on Pigouvian externality theory, where decarbonization is interpreted as a market correction mechanism addressing the divergence between marginal private and social costs. Second step proposes the construction of a structured cross-country dataset, incorporating key indicators related to emissions intensity, renewable energy integration, ESG performance, financial system development, institutional quality and geopolitical risk exposure. Third, a latent decarbonization potential function was proposed to be specified to capture multidimensional national capabilities for low-carbon transition. Fourth, unsupervised machine learning methods, including self-organizing maps (SOM) was proposed to be applied to classify countries into homogeneous decarbonization system.

Results. The empirical logic of the framework suggests that decarbonization is not a linear emissions-reduction process but a systemic transformation shaped by interactions between financial structures, institutional capacity, technological development and geopolitical constraints. The clustering results will provide a taxonomy of countries characterized by distinct transition profiles, including high-efficiency decarbonization economies, transition economies, and fossil-dependent economies. These clusters will be served as analytical foundations for identifying collaborative decarbonization hubs that enhance policy coordination, climate fi-nance efficiency and technology diffusion of countries. The study contributes to the literature by integrating economic externality theory with machine learning–based classification of national decarbonization path-ways, offering a unified analytical framework for evidence-based climate governance and sustainable economic transformation.

Discussion. Further research should be aimed at quantitative testing of the proposed model, the application of dynamic forecasting and artificial intelligence-based approaches, as well as scenario analysis of long-term decarbonization trajectories taking into account financial, technological and geopolitical factors.

References

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

Bolton, P., Després, M., Pereira da Silva, L. A., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The green swan: Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp31.htm

International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. Paris, France: IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. London, UK: Macmillan. https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/pigou-the-economics-of-welfare

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560

Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions. European Economic Review, 119, 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.05.007

Nordhaus, W. D. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991–2014. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991

Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2022). Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01250-z

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001

Network for Greening the Financial System. (2023). Climate-related litigation: Raising awareness about a growing source of risk. Paris, France: NGFS. https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/climate-related-litigation-raising-awareness-about-growing-source-risk

Hepburn, C., O’Callaghan, B., Stern, N., Stiglitz, J. E., & Zenghelis, D. (2020). Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36 (Suppl. 1), S359–S381. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa015

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131

Steininger, K. W., Williges, K., Meyer, L. H., et al. (2022). Sharing the effort of the European Green Deal among countries. Nature Communications, 13, 3673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31204-8

Lee, K., Yun, S. J., & Park, S. (2025). Varied drivers for reducing CO₂ emissions in countries with legislated carbon neutrality targets: A Kaya identity clustering analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06223-2

D’Arcangelo, F. M., Kruse, T., & Pisu, M. (2024). Identifying and tracking climate change mitigation strategies with a cluster-based assessment. npj Climate Action, 3, 86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00158-6

Matviychuk, A., Zhytkevych, O., & Osadcha, N. (2024). Modeling carbon dioxide emissions reduction. Energy Reports, 12, 1876–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.004

Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18, 139–165.

Zhytkevych, O. (2025). Review and selection of clustering algorithms for datasets in the context of countries’ decarbonization. Economy of Ukraine, 68(11), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2025.11.043

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Zhytkevych, O. (2026). ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF DECARBONIZATION: INTERNALIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES AND IDENTIFICATION OF COLLABORATIVE DECARBONIZATION HUBS. Economic Paradigm, (6(110), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.25313/3083-7782-2026-6-21

Issue

Section

Статті