ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A TOOL OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION: LINGUISTIC AND LEGAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/law-2026-3-97-8

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI-generated legal texts, legal language, legal communication, digitalization of law, terminology accuracy, ethical standards

Abstract

Introduction. The digitalization of legal practice and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to the emergence of new forms of creation and communication of legal texts, affecting the lexical, stylistic, and communicative levels of legal language. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of legal language transformation under the influence of AI, to assess the advantages and risks of AI-generated legal documents, and to develop recommendations for maintaining accuracy, stylistic correctness, and ethical standards. The object of the study is the process of creation and interpretation of legal texts, while the subject is the impact of AI on legal language and communication.

The study employs realistic methods: case analysis of practical examples (court decisions, recommendations of the Ministry of Digital Transformation and the Ministry of Justice, automated consultations, chatbots), comparative analysis of texts generated by AI and by human lawyers, and a systemic approach to integrate linguistic, legal, and ethical aspects. Modern methods of AI use for drafting claims, contracts, analytical reports, and consultations were analyzed, and the impact on terminology accuracy, stylistic adequacy, and risks of language simplification was assessed.

The results show that AI increases the productivity of lawyers, the speed of document processing, and access to legal information, while simultaneously creating risks of reduced legal precision, incorrect use of terminology, and violations of ethical norms. Ukrainian practice, including case No. 240/14153/24 of the Supreme Court of Ukraine [1] and recommendations for responsible AI use, confirms the necessity of combining technology with human supervision. The study substantiates a comprehensive approach to AI application in legal practice, ensuring accuracy, clarity, and reliability of legal documents in the digital era. Further research could focus on quantitative analysis of AI-generated texts in various branches of law.

References

Верховний Суд України. (2026, 15 січня). Справа № 240/14153/24: Адміністративна касаційна палата. URL: https://court.gov.ua/eng/supreme/pres-centr/news/1954015/ (дата звернення: 08.02.2026).

Mannonov A., Boymurodov B., Sultanova S., Umarova I., Khujaeva S., SШІdov J. The Role of AI and Legal Linguistics in Ensuring Compliance with Language Requirements in International Law. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2025. 15(2). P. 16–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2025.IJISS.15.2.03

Altakhaineh A. R. M., Alghathian G. A., Jarrah M. M. A Comparative Study of Accuracy in Human vs. AI Translation of Legal Documents into Arabic. International Journal of Language & Law. 2025. 14. P. 63–80. DOI: 10.14762/jll.2025.063

Wright S. Artificial Intelligence in Legal Translation at the Court of Justice of the European Union. International Journal of Language & Law. 2025. 14. P. 120–142. DOI: 10.14762/jll.2025.120

Madaoui N. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. Problems of Legality. 2023. 164. P. 285-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.164.289266

Кузьменко О. В., Лисенко І. В., & Гаряєва, Г. М. (2025). Актуальні питання використання технології штучного інтелекту в юридичній діяльності. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. 2023. Том 1, № 90. С. 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.1.14

Міністерство цифрової трансформації України, Міністерство юстиції України. 2023. Рекомендації щодо відповідального використання штучного інтелекту правниками. URL: https://storage.thedigital.gov.ua/files/2/72/fcf6c498e0a9f57e7a8521ff9833372d.pdf (дата звернення: 10.02.2026).

Огнев’юк Т. Штучний інтелект і верховенство права: світова практика та можливості для України. Слово національної школи суддів України. 2023. 4 (45). С. 64–70. DOI: 10.37566/2707-6849-2023-4(45)-5

Асоціація правників України (UBA). 2023. Оновлена база правових позицій Верховного Суду 2.0 та методичні рекомендації для юристів.. URL: https://uba.ua/eng/news/pravo-tekhnologi-verkhovnijj-sud-predstaviv-onovlenu-bazu-pravovikh-pozicjj-2-0-z-generativnim-sh (дата звернення: 27.01.2026).

Удовенко Ж. В., Галаган В. І., Шкелебей В. А. Використання штучного інтелекту у кримінальному провадженні під час дії воєнного стану. Право і безпека. 2025. 98(3). С. 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2025.3.07

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

Mys’ Т. І. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A TOOL OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION: LINGUISTIC AND LEGAL ASPECT. Modern Doctrine of Law, (3(97), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.25313/law-2026-3-97-8