INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BORROWER CREDITWORTHINESS IN DECENTRALIZED FINANCE BASED ON ON-CHAIN DATA: MODEL AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2026-2-11989

Keywords:

decentralized finance, borrower creditworthiness, liquidation risk, on-chain data, composite index, logit model, ROC/AUC

Abstract

Introduction. Decentralized finance (DeFi) has created an on‑chain segment of collateralized lending where risk is commonly managed via collateral heuristics (LTV, health factor) and automated liquidations. Yet realized liquidation risk also depends on liquidation execution (market liquidity and transaction costs), observable borrower behavior, and network exposures arising from composability.

Purpose. To develop a formalized integral on‑chain creditworthiness model for DeFi borrowers and empirically test its ability to discriminate liquidation risk relative to the one‑factor LTV benchmark.

Methods. We construct a domain‑based indicator system (collateral quality, position buffer, behavioral discipline, network exposures, and liquidation conditions) and build an Integral Creditworthiness index (IC) using orientation and min–max normalization, entropy‑based information weights, and hybrid weighting. Discriminatory power is evaluated via logit models and ROC/AUC on a 30% test split within a controlled mock‑simulation design calibrated to Aave/Compound parameters (n=600).

Results. The IC index delivers superior out‑of‑sample liquidation discrimination compared with the LTV baseline (AUC=0.764 vs 0.683; Accuracy=0.778 vs 0.756) while preserving interpretability through a transparent domain structure. Scenario stress tests for collateral price shocks ΔP{−10%, −20%, −30%} show a monotonic increase in predicted liquidation probability from risk classes A to E, and sensitivity analysis confirms metric stability for alternative hybrid‑weighting parameters λ{0.5, 0.7, 0.9}.

Prospects. Future work should calibrate IC on real on‑chain panels with labeled liquidations across market regimes, incorporate oracle and MEV risk drivers, and extend the framework toward PD/LGD‑type parameterization for DeFi lending portfolios.

References

Werner S. M., Perez D., Gudgeon L., Klages‑Mundt A., Harz D., Knottenbelt W. J. SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT ’22). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3558535.3559780

Gudgeon L., Werner S. M., Perez D., Knottenbelt W. J. DeFi protocols for loanable funds: interest rates, liquidity and market efficiency. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT ’20). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419614.3423254

Qin K., Zhou L., Afonin D., Lazzaretti L., Gervais A. An empirical study of DeFi liquidations: incentives, risks, and instabilities. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS ’21). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487552.3487811

Aspris A., Svec J. Locked in, levered up: risk, return, and ruin in DeFi lending. The British Accounting Review. 2025. Article 101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101691

Palaiokrassas G., Scherrers S., Makri E. Machine Learning in DeFi: credit risk assessment and liquidation prediction. IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634435

Altman E. I., Saunders A. Credit risk measurement: developments over the last 20 years. Journal of Banking & Finance. 1998. Vol. 21(11–12). P. 1721–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00036-8

Berg T., Burg V., Gombović A., Puri M. On the rise of fintechs: credit scoring using digital footprints. Review of Financial Studies. 2020. Vol. 33(7). P. 2845–2897. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz099

Rogge N. Composite indicators as generalized benefit‑of‑the‑doubt weighted averages. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018. Vol. 267(1). P. 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.048

Zhou P., Ang B. W., Poh K. L. A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecological Economics. 2007. Vol. 62(2). P. 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.010

Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal. 1948. Vol. 27(3). P. 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Lukianchuk Д. Ю. (2026). INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BORROWER CREDITWORTHINESS IN DECENTRALIZED FINANCE BASED ON ON-CHAIN DATA: MODEL AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION. Economic Paradigm, (2(106), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2026-2-11989