PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT IN THE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTING OF BANKS’ CREDIT OPERATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/economics-2026-3-107-16

Keywords:

professional judgement, bank accounting, credit operations, credit risk, expected credit losses, IFRS 9, banks’ financial reporting

Abstract

Introduction. Credit operations represent one of the principal areas of activity of banking institutions and occupy a significant place in the structure of their assets. They contribute substantially to the generation of banks’ income, while at the same time being associated with the risk of borrowers’ default. The accounting treatment of such operations requires the use of accounting estimates, forward-looking assumptions and analytical procedures. Under these conditions, professional judgement plays an important role in decision-making concerning the recognition, measurement and presentation of credit operations within the bank’s accounting system.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to determine the role of the accountant’s professional judgement in the accounting treatment of banks’ credit operations in the context of the application of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.

Materials and methods. The informational basis of the research includes International Financial Reporting Standards, analytical materials of the National Bank of Ukraine, as well as scientific publications by domestic and foreign scholars addressing issues related to the accounting of financial instruments and the assessment of credit risk. The study employs the methods of analysis and generalisation to examine academic approaches to the interpretation of professional judgement. The graphical method is used to present research results visually, in particular to illustrate the dynamics of credit risk indicators in the banking system of Ukraine and to visualise the algorithm for applying professional judgement and the structure for identifying accounting decisions in the process of accounting for banks’ credit operations. The comparative method is applied to contrast approaches to the measurement of credit losses under different accounting standards. The method of systematisation is used to organise the stages of accounting for credit operations, while the structural and logical method enables the development of an algorithm for the application of professional judgement and the identification of the sequence of accounting decisions in banking practice.

Results. The article summarises academic approaches to understanding professional judgement in accounting and clarifies its content in the context of accounting for banks’ credit operations. It is substantiated that the application of professional judgement is necessary at various stages of the accounting process, including the identification of the economic substance of credit transactions, the classification of financial assets, the assessment of borrowers’ credit risk, the determination of the stage of impairment of credit assets, and the calculation of expected credit losses. An algorithm for applying professional judgement in the assessment of banks’ credit operations is developed, reflecting the sequence of accounting decisions within the expected credit loss model. In addition, a structure for identifying accounting decisions in the process of accounting for credit operations is proposed, which allows the determination of stages in the accounting process where the use of professional judgement is essential for ensuring the reliability of accounting estimates and the transparency of banks’ financial reporting.

Discussion. Further research will focus on improving methodological approaches to the application of professional judgement in the assessment of credit risk and in determining allowances for expected credit losses in banking institutions.

References

Кузь В. Професійне судження бухгалтера як засіб підвищення ефективності функціонування системи бухгалтерського обліку суб’єкта господарювання . Цифрова економіка та економічна безпека. 2024. Вип. 4 (13). С. 48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.13-7

Маренич Т. Г., Ковальова Т. В. Системний підхід до сутності професійного судження бухгалтера. Бізнес Інформ. 2022. № 10. С. 132–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-10-132-144

Мельничук І. В., Лопатовська О. В. Професійне судження бухгалтера в умовах невизначеності. Економічний простір. 2021. № 168. С. 138-141. URL: http://srd.pgasa.dp.ua:8080/bitstream/123456789/6899/1/Melnychuk.pdf (дата звернення: 11.02.2026).

Національний банк України. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/en/statistic/supervision-statist (дата звернення: 11.02.2026).

Awuye IS, Taylor D. Over half a decade into the adoption of IFRS 9: a systematic literature review. Journal of Accounting Literature. 2025. Vol. 47, No. 4. Р. 793–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-11-2023-0204

Bischof J., Laux Ch., Leuz Ch. Accounting for financial stability: Bank disclosure and loss recognition in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics. 2021. Vol.141, Issue 3. P. 1188-1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.016.

Hansen S., Charifzadeh M., Herberger T. The impact of IFRS 9 on the cyclicality of loan loss provisions. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 2023. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22669

International Accounting Standards Board. IFRS 9: Financial instruments (effective 1 January 2018). IFRS Foundation. URL: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ifrs-9-financial-instruments/ (дата звернення: 11.02.2026).

Kyiu A., Tawiah V. IFRS 9 implementation and bank risk. Accounting Forum. 2025. Vol. 49, Issue 1. Р. 234–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2023.2233861

Libby R., Luft J. Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1993. Vol. 18, Issue 5. P. 425-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D

López-Espinosa G., Penalva F. Evidence from the adoption of IFRS 9 and the impact of COVID-19 on lending and regulatory capital on Spanish Banks. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2023. Vol. 42, Issue 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107097

Nelson M. Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Principles- and Rules-Based Standards. 2002.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.360441

Novotny-Farkas Z. The Interaction of the IFRS 9 Expected Loss Approach with Supervisory Rules and Implications for Financial Stability. Accounting in Europe. 2016. Vol. 13(2). P. 197–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180

Oberson R. The Credit-Risk Relevance of Loan Impairments Under IFRS 9 for CDS Pricing: Early Evidence. European Accounting Review. 2021. Vol. 30(5). P. 959–987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1956985

Pérez Р. Accounting and auditing of credit loss estimates: The hard and the soft. Latin American Journal of Central Banking. 2021. Vol. 2, Issue 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latcb.2021.100027

West A., Buckby S. Professional judgement in accounting and Aristotelian practical wisdom. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4949

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Makarovych В. К., & Loskorikh Г. Л. (2026). PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT IN THE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTING OF BANKS’ CREDIT OPERATIONS. Economic Paradigm, (3(107), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.25313/economics-2026-3-107-16

Issue

Section

Статті