MODELING CREDIT RISK IN DECENTRALIZED DIGITAL ASSET LENDING WITH LIQUIDITY ADJUSTMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/economics-2026-3-107-10

Keywords:

decentralized finance credit risk executable position safety factor expected loss liquidation risk Aave risk management

Abstract

Introduction. In DeFi lending, a position becoming eligible for liquidation does not by itself imply a loss for the protocol. Loss arises when a fall in collateral prices, limited short-horizon liquidity, the liquidation bonus and delayed governance response jointly reduce executable collateral value below outstanding debt.

Purpose. To build a model for probability of loss, loss given default and expected loss in DeFi lending where the core unit of analysis is a position observed under a specific market regime rather than a generic wallet score.

Materials and methods. The paper applies the SLG-EL model, which combines mark health factor, executable position safety factor, a liquidity-adjusted recovery function, a logit specification for loss-PD and a governance-sensitive decision layer. The empirical basis relies on open protocol and market inputs for Aave v3 Ethereum, while stress regimes and representative positions are treated as scenario assumptions. The research design is model-based and scenario-based rather than a full panel back-test.

Results. A position may remain formally safe under the standard health factor while already losing its buffer for loss-free liquidation under the executable metric. For representative WETH and WBTC positions, expected loss rises non-linearly; in the stylised mini-portfolio it increases from zero in the normal regime to 0.27% of EAD in the fragile regime and 2.56% in the stress regime. The strongest sensitivity is observed for large positions relative to available market depth.

Prospects. Further research should validate the framework on full position-level Aave and Compound panels, refine the executable-liquidity function for alternative DEX routes and extend the model to multi-collateral portfolios.

References

Werner S. M., Perez D., Gudgeon L., Klages-Mundt A., Harz D., Knottenbelt W. J. SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3558535.3559780.

Gudgeon L., Werner S. M., Perez D., Knottenbelt W. J. DeFi protocols for loanable funds: interest rates, liquidity and market efficiency. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419614.3423254.

Qin K., Zhou L., Afonin D., Lazzaretti L., Gervais A. An empirical study of DeFi liquidations: incentives, risks, and instabilities. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487552.3487811.

Cornelli G., Gambacorta L., Garratt R., Reghezza A. Why DeFi lending? Evidence from Aave V2. Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2025. Vol. 63. Article 101166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2025.101166.

Gadzinski G., Liuzzi V. Do liquidations discourage lending in DeFi? Economics Letters. 2025. Vol. 255. Article 112537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112537.

Nguyen M. H., Nguyen B. T., Pham H., Thi Thu P. T. et al. The determinants of funding liquidity risk in decentralized lending. Global Finance Journal. 2025. Article 101055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101055.

Brauneis A., Mestel R., Riordan R., Theissen E. Bitcoin unchained: determinants of cryptocurrency exchange liquidity. Journal of Empirical Finance. 2022. Vol. 69. P. 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2022.08.004.

Cartea A., Drissi F., Monga M. Decentralised finance and automated market making: execution and speculation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2025. Vol. 177. Article 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2025.105134.

Makarov I., Schoar A. Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Financial Economics. 2020. Vol. 135(2). P. 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.001.

Baesens B., Smedts K. Boosting credit risk models. The British Accounting Review. 2025. Vol. 57(4). Article 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101241.

Stepankova B., Teply P. Consistency of banks' internal probability of default estimates: empirical evidence from the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2023. Vol. 154. Article 106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106969.

Botha A., Verster T. Approaches for modelling the term-structure of default risk under IFRS 9: a tutorial using discrete-time survival analysis. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 2026. Vol. 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01032-w.

Caccioli F., Ferrara G., Ramadiah A., others. Modelling fire sale contagion across banks and non-banks. Journal of Financial Stability. 2024. Vol. 71. Article 101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101231.

Aspris A., Svec J. Locked in, levered up: risk, return, and ruin in DeFi lending. The British Accounting Review. 2025. Article 101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101691.

Aave Governance. Aave Governance Process Document v1. URL: https://governance.aave.com/t/aave-governance-process-document-v1/18577 (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

Aave Protocol Documentation. Aave Protocol Parameter Dashboard. URL: https://aave.com/docs/resources/parameters (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

Aave Labs. How Aave Liquidations Perform Under Volatile Conditions. URL: https://aave.com/blog/historical-liquidations (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

CoinGecko. Market data for Ethereum and Wrapped Bitcoin. URL: https://www.coingecko.com/ (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

GeckoTerminal. WETH/USDC and WBTC/WETH pools on Ethereum. URL: https://www.geckoterminal.com/eth (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

Aave Help. Health Factor & Liquidations. URL: https://aave.com/help/borrowing/liquidations (дата звернення: 07.02.2026).

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Lukianchuk Д. Ю. (2026). MODELING CREDIT RISK IN DECENTRALIZED DIGITAL ASSET LENDING WITH LIQUIDITY ADJUSTMENT. Economic Paradigm, (3(107), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.25313/economics-2026-3-107-10

Issue

Section

Статті