PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINING EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN ENTERPRISES UNDER MARTIAL LAW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25313/3083-7782-2026-6-19

Keywords:

martial law, hardiness, employee motivation, supportive leadership, psychological safety, psychological resources, resilience, self-efficacy

Abstract

Introduction. The transformation of the professional environment under martial law and prolonged macroeconomic instability has caused significant changes in employee motivation. Working under security risks, uncertainty, and long-term psycho-emotional pressure shifts motivational priorities from career advancement and professional self-realization toward safety, stability, and psychological protection. In such circumstances, traditional material and administrative incentives lose effectiveness, underscoring the need to identify psychological resources to sustain motivation.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the psychological resources for sustaining employee motivation in enterprises under martial law and to determine their role in ensuring professional engagement and organizational resilience in the face of crisis challenges.

Materials and methods. The study is based on scientific works in organizational psychology, work psychology, human resource management, and employee motivation; analytical materials and sociological studies on the psychological state of the population, labor market transformation, and work under martial law; and modern concepts of hardiness, resilience, self-efficacy, and psychological capital. The research used theoretical generalization, analysis and synthesis, comparative and systemic analysis, theoretical modeling, and logical generalization. These methods enabled the systematization of approaches to employee motivation, the examination of wartime stress factors, the identification of links between individual, interpersonal, and organizational resources, and the development of an integrated model of motivation support.

Results. The article examines the influence of wartime stress factors, including chronic fatigue, emotional tension, security risks, and staff shortages, on the transformation of work motivation mechanisms in enterprises. The main tendencies in employees’ motivational priorities under martial law are identified, in particular, the growing significance of safety, psychological stability, and social support. It is substantiated that hardiness, resilience, self-efficacy, and psychological capital are key individual resources that help preserve professional activity, readiness for action, and adaptability in the face of uncertainty.

Particular attention is paid to interpersonal and organizational factors that support motivation in crisis conditions, including supportive leadership, psychological safety, a favorable socio-psychological climate, and psychological well-being programs. Employees’ motivational potential during wartime depends not only on individual coping capacity but also on the quality of the organizational environment and social support within the enterprise.

The article proposes an integrated three-level model of psychological resources for sustaining employee motivation. The model combines individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels of influence and may serve as a theoretical basis for practical programs aimed at strengthening personnel resilience, maintaining engagement, and improving human resource management.

Further research in this area. Further research should focus on empirically verifying the developed model using representative samples of employees from enterprises across different sectors of the Ukrainian economy. A promising direction is the assessment of the relationship between employees’ psychological capital and indicators of professional effectiveness under post-war recovery. The practical value of the study lies in identifying priorities that can help enterprises maintain engagement, reduce prolonged stress, and strengthen organizational resilience during wartime and reconstruction.

References

Vartanova, O. B., & Povzun, D. I. (2024). Formuvannia klasteru personalizovanoi stiikosti v strukturi modeli kompetentsii yak umova formuvannia personalizovanoi stabilnosti v umovakh viiny [Formation of a cluster of personalized resilience in the structure of the competency model as a condition for the formation of personalized stability in wartime]. Zhurnal stratehichnykh ekonomichnykh doslidzhen, 1(18). https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2024.1.6 [in Ukrainian].

Herasymenko, O. O., & Potapenko, A. V. (2023). Dominanty motyvatsii personalu v konteksti transformatsii rynku pratsi Ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Dominants of personnel motivation in the context of transformations of the labor market of Ukraine under martial law]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 49. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-49-46 [in Ukrainian].

Horbal, N. I., & Melnychuk, K. Yu. (2023). Pidvyshchennia motyvatsii pratsivnykiv ukrainskykh pidpryiemstv v umovakh kryzy [Increasing the motivation of employees of Ukrainian enterprises in crisis conditions]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia», 7(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.23939/semi2023.01.107 [in Ukrainian].

Kyivskyi mizhnarodnyi instytut sotsiolohii (KMIS). (2025). Stresovi sytuatsii v zhytti ukraintsiv, 2024 [Stressful situations in the lives of Ukrainians, 2024]. Retrieved from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?cat=reports&id=1472&lang=ukr&page=1 [in Ukrainian].

Kozak, K. B., Korsikova, N. M., & Petrenko, Yu. O. (2022). Upravlinnia motyvatsiieiu personalu v umovakh postpandemii ta voiennoho stanu [Management of personnel motivation in the conditions of post-pandemic and martial law]. Ekonomika kharchovoi promyslovosti, 14(4), 26–34. DOI https://doi.org/10.15673/fie.v14i4.2426 [in Ukrainian].

Kozlova, I. M., & Kovnir, N. A. (2024). Motyvatsiia medychnykh pratsivnykiv v umovakh viiny: vyklyky ta perspektyvy [Motivation of medical workers in wartime conditions: challenges and prospects]. Naukovi pratsi MAUP. Ekonomichni nauky, 76, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/76-12 [in Ukrainian].

Kokun, O. M. (2025). Zhyttiestiikist i rezylientnist liudyny v suchasnomu sviti: teoriia, doslidzhennia, praktyka [Hardiness and resilience of a person in the modern world: theory, research, practice]. Kyiv: Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Kudinova, A. O., & Zieliov, R. Ya. (2024). Udoskonalennia systemy motyvatsii personalu yak chynnyka zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Improving the personnel motivation system as a factor in ensuring sustainable development of the enterprise]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii, 12(40), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-12(40)-268-278 [in Ukrainian].

Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. (2025). Infliatsiinyi zvit. Lypen 2025 roku [Inflation report. July 2025]. Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/inflyatsiyniy-zvit-lipen-2025-roku

Serdiuk, L. Z. (Ed.). (2024). Psykholohichni tekhnolohii spryiannia pozytyvnomu psykhichnomu zdoroviu riznykh verstv naselennia Ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho stanu ta pisliavoiennoho vidnovlennia [Psychological technologies for promoting positive mental health of various segments of the population of Ukraine under martial law and post-war reconstruction]. Kyiv: Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/742839/ [in Ukrainian].

Tsentr ekonomichnoi stratehii. (2026). Treker ekonomiky Ukrainy pid chas viiny [Tracker of Ukraine's economy during the war]. Retrieved from https://ces.org.ua/tracker-economy-during-the-war/ [in Ukrainian].

Chykhantsova, O. A. (2021). Psykholohichni osnovy zhyttiestiikosti osobystosti [Psychological foundations of personality resilience]. Kyiv: Talkom. Retrieved from https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/727629/ [in Ukrainian].

Gradus Research. (2025). Shcho ukraintsi vidchuvaiut na 4-mu rotsi viiny [What Ukrainians feel in the 4th year of the war]. Retrieved from https://gradus.app/report/feelings-coping-4th-year-of-war/ [in Ukrainian].

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Baratta, M. V., Seligman, M. E. P., & Maier, S. F. (2023). From helplessness to controllability: toward a neuroscience of resilience. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1170417

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological Capital and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Southwick, S. M., & Charney, D. S. (2018). Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life's Greatest Challenges (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Kozlova, I., & Podolska, O. (2026). PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINING EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN ENTERPRISES UNDER MARTIAL LAW. Economic Paradigm, (6(110), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.25313/3083-7782-2026-6-19

Issue

Section

Статті